Strange Islands.



Untitled

My life as a scrapbook.






Theme by spaceperson Powered by Tumblr

klammer
Tagged
Art





Francis Bacon, Study for a Portrait. (1991)
From the National Galleries of Scotland.
via cavetocanvas:

This is one of the last paintings Bacon completed. It is the second in a series of three portraits of his friend, the artist Anthony Zych. Zych appears to be standing in a doorway, possibly that of the artist’s studio. The camera tripod is an element repeated from the central panel of a triptych painted in 1944. Bacon’s portraits were almost without exception of people with whom he was familiar. He preferred to paint his subjects not from life but from photographs.

Francis Bacon, Study for a Portrait. (1991)

From the National Galleries of Scotland.

via cavetocanvas:

This is one of the last paintings Bacon completed. It is the second in a series of three portraits of his friend, the artist Anthony Zych. Zych appears to be standing in a doorway, possibly that of the artist’s studio. The camera tripod is an element repeated from the central panel of a triptych painted in 1944. Bacon’s portraits were almost without exception of people with whom he was familiar. He preferred to paint his subjects not from life but from photographs.

(Source: nationalgalleries.org)




Francisco Goya was born on 30 March 1746 (d.1828).

The Third of May 1808 is the picture against which all future paintings of tragic violence would have to measure themselves. It is truly modern, never surpassed in its newness, so raw that although it was a state commission it remained in storage, unseen by the public for the first 40 years of its life.
The surface is ragged: no smooth finish. The blood on the ground is a dark alizarin crimson smeared on thick and then scraped back with a palette knife, so that it looks crusty and scratchy, just like real blood smeared by the twitches of a dying body. You can’t “read” the wounds that disfigure the face of the man on the ground, but as signs of trauma in paint they are inexpressibly shocking - their imprecision conveys the thought that you can’t look at them.
The man about to be shot faces martyrdom in a clean white shirt, throwing out his arms in a gesture that recalls the Crucifixion, a gesture of indescribable power, flinging out life in defiance. The coarse, swarthy, dilated face - all vitality. The faces of the pueblo , the Spanish people, keep their individuality right up to the edge of the mass grave which is their destiny. They are the opposite of the utter anonymity of the firing squad - all identical backs, braced into the recoil of those big .70-calibre flintlocks. The men featureless, the hill featureless. This is the first truly modern image of war, the first to register the machine-like efficiency of oppression. It is as unlike all previous war paintings as Wilfred Owen’s trench poems are unlike all Victorian war poetry. No glory; only pity and loss, and the defiant humanity of the victims.
- Robert Hughes
via The Guardian: Goya’s Unflinching Eye

Francisco Goya was born on 30 March 1746 (d.1828).

The Third of May 1808 is the picture against which all future paintings of tragic violence would have to measure themselves. It is truly modern, never surpassed in its newness, so raw that although it was a state commission it remained in storage, unseen by the public for the first 40 years of its life.

The surface is ragged: no smooth finish. The blood on the ground is a dark alizarin crimson smeared on thick and then scraped back with a palette knife, so that it looks crusty and scratchy, just like real blood smeared by the twitches of a dying body. You can’t “read” the wounds that disfigure the face of the man on the ground, but as signs of trauma in paint they are inexpressibly shocking - their imprecision conveys the thought that you can’t look at them.

The man about to be shot faces martyrdom in a clean white shirt, throwing out his arms in a gesture that recalls the Crucifixion, a gesture of indescribable power, flinging out life in defiance. The coarse, swarthy, dilated face - all vitality. The faces of the pueblo , the Spanish people, keep their individuality right up to the edge of the mass grave which is their destiny. They are the opposite of the utter anonymity of the firing squad - all identical backs, braced into the recoil of those big .70-calibre flintlocks. The men featureless, the hill featureless. This is the first truly modern image of war, the first to register the machine-like efficiency of oppression. It is as unlike all previous war paintings as Wilfred Owen’s trench poems are unlike all Victorian war poetry. No glory; only pity and loss, and the defiant humanity of the victims.

- Robert Hughes

via The Guardian: Goya’s Unflinching Eye

04:59 pm, by jamreilly5 notes Comments

The critic Frank Kermode has argued, persuasively, I believe, that one of art’s greatest attractions is that it offers “the sense of an ending.” The sense of completeness that is projected by the work of art is to be found nowhere else in our lives. We cannot remember our birth, and we shall not know our death; in between is the ramshackle circus of our days and doings. But in a poem, a picture, or a sonata, the curve is completed. This is the triumph of form. It is a deception, but one that we desire, and require.

07:00 pm, by jamreilly Comments

“The result of the struggle between the thought and the ability to express it, between dream and reality, is seldom more than a compromise or an approximation. Thus there is little chance that we will succeed in getting through to a large audience, and on the whole we are quite satisfied if we are understood and appreciated by a small number of sensitive, receptive people.”
M. C. Escher, Dutch graphic artist. He is known for his often mathematically inspired woodcuts, lithographs, and mezzotints (1898-1972), On Being a Graphic Artis (via amiquote)


03:25 pm, by jamreilly24 notes Comments

The Embrace.

An essay by John Berger on the paintings of Rembrandt.

“The human was no longer self-evident. It had to be found in the darkness.”


Part 2 below:


09:40 pm, by jamreilly4 notes Comments

Revolution in the Head.

Lack of a frame of reference is precisely what this life-on-demand technology collaborates with our self-centredness to produce. We live in a tacky cultural mall where the past – past people, past “styles” – are just commodities. We have no sense of these people: why they did and said the things they did. We take their work without reference to context, refusing to treat it as if it has any historical autonomy or specificity. This lets us make it into anything we like – but the result is that the depth and quality of feeling that gave birth to these works vanishes and their original dynamic evaporates. You see this in classical music, the further performances get from a composer’s sociocultural location: timbres and dissonances are smoothed over, tempos become distorted (slow ones get funereal, fast ones emptily virtuosic), and the “inner” structure of the music gradually fades away.

Fortunately, there are musicians who are trying to reverse such trends, though I’ve yet to find a music critic who understands what they’re up to. In pop music, a classic instance of this is Sergeant Pepper. People who weren’t around during 1967 often haven’t a clue what that record is about and so miss its “inner” meanings. In terms of thought and feeling, it’s a far deeper album than Revolver, with which these days it’s unfavourably compared. But if you don’t care about context, you’ll never sense this and never benefit from it. To the extent that we turn art into whatever we want it to mean, we forfeit the chance of being changed by it, of being enhanced by it. Only if we make an effort to take it on its original terms, can we get something from it that isn’t a mere reflection of ourselves.

- Ian MacDonald (1948 - 2003)

from an interview with David Lubich

02:31 pm, by jamreilly1 note Comments



At The Dressing Table, 1909, by Zinaida Serebriakova.

If you were asked to write from memory what you can remember of a  painting in words, it is quite a task, but quite a revealing one,  because it highlights the details you focussed upon. I for example  remember a young woman in her early twenties, sat before a mirror, she  is attending to her hair. The painting is exuberant, even cheerful in  its characterisation of the sitter and in the choice of the palette. I  got the impression of youth and joy of life. It was a portrait of  optimism and above all confidence in being a woman. The other impression  was that it seemed very modern despite being painted a century ago.
Now I am looking at the portrait. It is an autobiographical portrait –  the sitter is the painter herself, Zinaida Serebriakova (1884-1967).  Notice the use of white in the modelling of the face and in nearly every  object. It is white that reflects back to us as the viewer and gives us  here a sense of the brightness – look how the linen in the reflection  is used to contrast and delineate her face and hair, how the planes of  white lead into each other.

More via: Escape into Life - Stephen Pain: Zinaida Serebriakova and The Soviet Nude

At The Dressing Table, 1909, by Zinaida Serebriakova.

If you were asked to write from memory what you can remember of a painting in words, it is quite a task, but quite a revealing one, because it highlights the details you focussed upon. I for example remember a young woman in her early twenties, sat before a mirror, she is attending to her hair. The painting is exuberant, even cheerful in its characterisation of the sitter and in the choice of the palette. I got the impression of youth and joy of life. It was a portrait of optimism and above all confidence in being a woman. The other impression was that it seemed very modern despite being painted a century ago.

Now I am looking at the portrait. It is an autobiographical portrait – the sitter is the painter herself, Zinaida Serebriakova (1884-1967). Notice the use of white in the modelling of the face and in nearly every object. It is white that reflects back to us as the viewer and gives us here a sense of the brightness – look how the linen in the reflection is used to contrast and delineate her face and hair, how the planes of white lead into each other.

More via: Escape into Life - Stephen Pain: Zinaida Serebriakova and The Soviet Nude

03:39 pm, by jamreilly11 notes Comments



FRED TOMASELLIHang Over, 2005 (Leaves, pills, acrylic, resin on wood panel)
via

FRED TOMASELLI
Hang Over, 2005
(Leaves, pills, acrylic, resin on wood panel)

via

09:31 pm, by jamreilly4 notes Comments



Floréal III
by Terry Haass, 1960.
via Adventures in the Print Trade

Floréal III

by Terry Haass, 1960.

via Adventures in the Print Trade

11:41 pm, by jamreilly14 notes Comments

Limitations are the greatest assets in producing a work of art

“It seems to me that the personal limitations each individual is endowed with is the only true evaluation one must adjust to. I know this sounds complicated but it is about the only yardstick that makes sense. Limitations, honestly faced, are the greatest assets in producing a work of art. I am always impressed by ones ability to push his limitations to unknown, unexplored, realms rather than settling for the unexplicable endowment of talent. Anyone with their five senses operating normally is talented. The artist, or so it seems to me at any rate, takes his talent for granted and then pushes his limitation beyond the normal accomplishment of a gifted civilian. If all this nonsense comes across as nonsense I must confess it is all that I have learned across a lifetime of trying to unravel the pure magic of a simple line drawn across a blank piece of paper.”

from letter by Al Hirschfeld to Peter Emslie

via Letters of Note

12:47 pm, by jamreilly Comments



Georges Lacombe: Autumn - The Chestnut Gatherers (1894)
via The Blue Lantern: The Sculptor Nabi Who Painted

Georges Lacombe: Autumn - The Chestnut Gatherers (1894)

via The Blue Lantern: The Sculptor Nabi Who Painted

09:39 pm, by jamreilly25 notes Comments



Thomas Alexander Harrison: Solitude (1893)
via lethebashar & voodoovoodoo

Thomas Alexander Harrison: Solitude (1893)

via lethebashar & voodoovoodoo


The painter does not paint on a virgin canvas.
The writer does not write on a blank page.
The page or the canvas are already covered over with pre-existing, pre-established cliches. (habits of sight & habits of thought).

The cliches must be scraped away to find a singular vital space of possibility.
For cliche is precisely what prevents the genesis of an image.
(just as opinion & convention prevent the genesis of thought).

Gilles Deleuze

via syncopath


06:46 pm, by jamreilly27 notes Comments



via lethebashar & art-documents:

Aiko Miyanaga

“Like precious gems, Aiko Miyanaga’s crystalline  sculptures reflect light and shine with a brilliance that beguiles the  viewer. But while diamonds are forever, Miyanaga’s carefully crafted  forms are not long for this world. In fact, some of her pieces are gone  before her exhibitions even come to a close.”
- Japan Times : Who Says An Art Work Must Exist?

via lethebashar & art-documents:

Aiko Miyanaga

“Like precious gems, Aiko Miyanaga’s crystalline sculptures reflect light and shine with a brilliance that beguiles the viewer. But while diamonds are forever, Miyanaga’s carefully crafted forms are not long for this world. In fact, some of her pieces are gone before her exhibitions even come to a close.”

- Japan Times : Who Says An Art Work Must Exist?