#Liverpool Biennial 2012.
#Liverpool Biennial 2012.
Image from Living Architecture: India via butdoesitfloat
LINK REMIX: Drowning our debts and worries in the techno bog.
The mind has no existence by itself, it is only the glitter of the sun on the surface of the waters.
- D. H. Lawrence. via whiskey river
We buy our books to give shape to our thinking, but it never occurs to us that the manner in which we make our purchases may have a more lasting influence on our character than the contents of the book.
When dollar-gold convertibility was abandoned once and for all in 1973, borrowers and lenders began to ply a more insubstantial trade. .. Paper money debts, being no more than titles to future slips of paper, multiply more easily than debts reckoned in fixed sums of specie, and, starting in the early 1970s, overall indebtedness has indeed grown faster than most national economies.
The Reformation .. emphasized a Protestant’s private communion with the Lord. Thus, individuals were left to manage their own bad consciences .. Kierkegaard and then the existentialists would riff on this theme of a dread that attends individual freedom and responsibility.
new technology typically sets in motion a now familiar script. At first, the technology is deemed to have little import or to fulfill only very specific, limited uses. Consider, for example, this casual dismissal by The New York Times in 1939: “The problem with television is that people must sit and keep their eyes glued on a screen; the average American family hasn’t time for it.”
How dare you call me a Nazi?”
“You effectively are behaving as one. You’re not voting against them. Which has the effect of helping them.”
“That’s ridiculous. I like Schindler’s List as much as the next guy. I hate Nazis!”“Just not enough to do the one thing they don’t want, to vote against them.”
We are all living a dream that our hearts are pure tuning forks, and we simply have to tune out the noises around us and listen to the pure vibration coming from our hearts, and then – beyond all concern for evidence or the reality of the way things work – we will know what to do.
I was literally glutted with culture, I had to come out and put my head in a stream in a bog in Connemara and let it all wash out and start again and remake my mind.
♫ Music: Waves in Water via shellachead:
Jal tarang is an instrument that consists of ceramic bowls tuned by water .. It’s used in both Hindustani and Carnatic music.
Link Remix: Melancholic Cyborgs Singing in My Head.
Despite several days of overcast skies, the weather’s been pleasantly mild and dry this week in this corner of the west of Ireland. Among the stories that have most caught my eye and mind recently:
It’s gotten to the point where my phone now somehow knows more about me than anyone else in the world, including my own darling husband. My gadget has become a tiny black mirror, reflecting back how I see myself. Which means things are getting more complicated between us.ᔥ via Boston Magazine
Memories are not formed and then pristinely maintained, as neuroscientists thought; they are formed and then rebuilt every time they’re accessed. “The brain isn’t interested in having a perfect set of memories about the past,” LeDoux says. “Instead, memory comes with a natural updating mechanism, which is how we make sure that the information taking up valuable space inside our head is still useful. ᔥ via Wired
Our spread over the earth was fueled by reducing the higher species of vegetation to charcoal, by incessantly burning whatever would burn. From the first smouldering taper to the elegant lanterns whose light reverberated around eighteenth-century courtyards and from the mild radiance of these lanterns to the unearthly glow of the sodium lamps that line the Belgian motorways, it has all been combustion. Combustion is the hidden principle behind every artifact we create. The making of fish-hook, manufacture of a china cup, or production of a television program, all depend on the same process of combustion. Like our bodies and like our desires, the machines we have devised are possessed of a heart which is slowly reduced to embers. ᔥ via Quarterly Conversation
Writing is a miraculous technology all its own—a code that, when input through the optic nerve, induces structured, coherent hallucinations. An equivalent experience does not exist. Words have shape and musicality. They almost have a flavor. But they are too easily drowned out by stronger stimuli. ᔥ via n+1
Two Minds in One Brain: In this short, humourous and enlightening clip, in a discussion moderated by Alan “Hawkeye” Alda, neuroscientist Giulio Tononi talks about the odd phenomenon of “split-brain” patients with filmmaker Charlie Kaufman. ᔥ via World Science Festival
Sticking to brains and their two hemispheres: Pirate-Eye Pigeons Reveal How The Brain Talks To Itself.
there is also a lot of evidence suggesting that even if both hemispheres contribute equally to a cognitive task such as speech or creating a visual model of the world, each half may favor particular aspects of that task. For her part, Mann hopes to untangle these issues. And she thinks there is no better model than bird brains. ᔥ via Scientific American
The Fabric of the Cosmos with Brian Greene. I’ve only watched the first two of four episodes so far and aside from the occasionally silly (though often helpful) televisual gimmicry it’s a very good lesson in contemporary physics, both thought-provoking and thought-stopping. ᔥ via Open Culture.
In the week that #STOPJOSEPHKONY hysteria gripped the interweb, some needed perspective from netizens in Uganda: Can A Viral Video really #StopKony?
On a similar note, I watched a Ted talk recently by Nigerian novelist Chimamanda Adichie and her message was that if we hear only a single story about another person or country, we risk a critical misunderstanding.
“Power is the ability not just to tell the story of another person, but to make it the definitive story of that person”
Finally some music, a haunting piece from Gavin Bryars, the first release on Brian Eno’s Obscure record label in 1975, deserving of renewed interest in this the 100th anniversary year of the event commemorated therein: The Sinking of The Titanic. ᔥ via youtube
This symbol ᔥ used in places above is from a new project aimed at encouraging the culture of attribution for the stuff we share on the web. You can read more about it here from Maria Popova ᔥ Brainpickings: Introducing The Curator’s Code.
Image: illustration by Alexander Surikov (1931) via A Journey Round My Skull.
It’s been a week of persistent wind and rain here in the northwest of Ireland. My attention was blown hither and thither along the internet. In Capital Realism; or Zombie World Redivivus I found an outline and excerpts from a book by Mark Fischer that dissects the problems facing our, as he sees it, artificial culture:
“In his dreadful lassitude and objectless rage, (Kurt) Cobain seemed to give wearied voice to the despondency of the generation that had come after history, whose every move was anticipated, tracked, bought and sold before it had even happened. Cobain knew that he was just another piece of spectacle, that nothing runs better on MTV than a protest against MTV; knew that his every move was a cliche scripted in advance, knew that even realizing it is a cliche.” Like a dead man in an imaginary museum Cobain adapted to the masks of an unreasoning culture to show forth the zombie styles of an age of revolt that was itself never a revolt, but only another decadence of hyperstylization of the transglobal machine that feeds upon such detritus with a relish that makes any form of rebellion seem nothing more than a final capitulation and affirmation of megacapital’s very power of inscripting and incorporating all rebellions. (link)
Do we ever know anything for sure? Jeff Carreira has a good post about Charles Sanders Peirce’s view on this topic of epistemology and how our thoughts are more like a painting of reality than a mirroring of it:
Imagine that a painter paints a landscape. The landscape on the page may be beautiful, but it will not be a perfect reflection of the landscape in front of him. Now let us imagine that this painting is given to another painter who tries to paint the landscape himself based on what he sees in this picture. Then that painting is given to another painter who uses it as a model for a third painting and another and another. If we could take the one thousandth painting that was painted based on the nine hundred ninety ninth painting and bring that one back to the original landscape I wonder how different it would be. What if we did this a million times? Peirce saw our own thoughts building in something like this way. (link)
Along the same subject line, George Lakoff, on explainer.net, in a discussion of the need for journalists to decode the metaphors they use, makes the very important point that
language is not a neutral system of communication, because it is always based on frames, conceptual metaphors, narratives, and emotions. (link)
With reference to the current turmoil in Egypt, Vinay Gupta explains what he sees as wrong with our present thinking about the world and rightly decries our lauding of “democracy” as a goal and a good in itself:
I am scared that the current generation of political activists, by seizing on democracy as the cause are completely missing the point. Democracy is a means to an end: good, just government. Right now we have democracy, but without good, just government, and this is the crisis of our times. We have fallen from grace, while retaining our vote. (link)
In The Guardian Jon Savage celebrates the 40th anniversary of the release of the album Stormcock by the seminal and eccentric British folk musician Roy Harper, who turns 70 this year. I attended a concert last year by Joanna Newsom and was delighted to discover the legendary Harper to be playing the support gig, my first time to see him and it was a rivetting and joyful performance. From that album:
I watched a good BBC documentary on Youtube this week - Krautrock: The Rebirth of Germany - with many interesting interviews with the now much elder protagonists of that time in German culture when ‘between 1968 and 1977 bands like Neu!, Can, Faust and Kraftwerk would look beyond western rock and roll to create some of the most original and uncompromising music ever heard.’ (link)
Finally, bearing in mind the great influence exerted by that German music scene upon the genesis of techno music in Detroit in the 1980s, some, perhaps unusually ambient to some ears, techno from 1996:
Take care out there ;)
Image via Old Paint : Carnival by Henri Rousseau (1844 - 1910)
In The Guardian, Saul Hampton writes about the relation between some of the concerns of 16th century French essayist Michel Montaigne regarding human sympathy with contemporary neurological research about mirror neurons:
Montaigne has a reputation as a sceptical and slightly otherworldly observer of human affairs, surveying life from the isolation of his ivy-covered tower. But in the body of his work – his Essays and the Travel Journal of his trip to Italy – his writing displays an obsessive concern with the power of personal presence in moral life, and a fascination with how people act on, influence and affect each other through their physical being. In this, Montaigne can be seen to reflect a characteristically Renaissance concern with gesture and deportment. Shakespeare, in The Winter’s Tale, describes Leontes and Camillo as having “speech in their dumbness, language in their very gesture”. And Francis Bacon observes: “As the tongue speaketh to the ear, so the gesture speaketh to the eye.” (link)
In The New Republic Nicholas Carr reviews a new biography of Marshall McLuhan by Douglas Coupland:
The Gutenberg Galaxy, published in 1962, explored the cultural and personal consequences of the invention of the printing press, and argued that Gutenberg’s invention shaped the modern mind. Two years later, Understanding Media extended the analysis to the electronic media of the twentieth century, which, McLuhan famously argued, were destroying the individualist ethic of print culture and turning the world into a tightly networked global village.
McLuhan was a scholar of literature, with a doctorate from Cambridge, and his interpretation of the intellectual and social effects of media was richly allusive and erudite. But what particularly galvanized the public was the weirdness of his prose. Perhaps because of his unusual mind, he had a knack for writing sentences that sounded at once clinical and mystical. His books read like accounts of acid trips written by a bureaucrat. That kaleidoscopic, almost psychedelic style made him a darling of the counterculture—the bearded and the Birkenstocked embraced him as a guru—but it alienated him from his colleagues in academia. To them, McLuhan was a celebrity-seeking charlatan. (link)
An article in The Millions - Darts and Philosophy, Bowling and Metaphysics: A Primer on the Novels of Jean-Philippe Toussaint - has me curious to find and read some of this, previously unheard-of, writer’s work:
He placed great importance on humor at the beginning of his career, and though to an extent he still does, he’s since balanced it with a certain wistfulness. He eschews shades of gray, but he places so many black and white extremes so near to one another that, if you step back, they look like gray. He believes novels have no political role, only an aesthetic one. He deals with both the little irritations and the Big Questions, usually in as close a proximity as possible. He respects no boundary between fiction and nonfiction. And as he said in that Bookworm conversation, you can perform all the experimentation, all the rigid structuring, all the nouveau roman stuff you want, but if your book isn’t first and foremost exciting, hang it up. (link)
I recently discovered the very interesting research and work of psychologist George Ainslee (several essays here) on the roots of human motivation, including a precis of his 2001 book Breakdown of Will :
Behavioral science has long been puzzled by the experience of temptation, the resulting impulsiveness, and the variably successful control of this impulsiveness. Breakdown of Will presents evidence that contradicts rational models in which discounting the value of future events at a constant rate keeps preference consistent. Both people and nonhuman animals discount the value of expected events in a curve where value is divided approximately by expected delay, a hyperbolic form that is more bowed than the rational, exponential curve. This finding implies that conflicting reward-seeking processes will arise spontaneously to get incompatible goals available at different times, that in humans these processes will in effect bargain with each other, and that this bargaining can create ego functions like willpower from the bottom up. Motivation-based models of classical conditioning, compulsiveness, empathy, and the social construction of belief become possible. (link)
My sole musical offering this week is a piece of mesmerising (to me anyway) minimal techno from 2006 by Tunisian-born Yassine Ben Achour (a.k.a. Loco Dice) :
Take care out there ;)
At the time of Red Cloud’s War, the Plains Indians had just become familiar with the white man’s tools for writing and drawing - graphite, colored pencils, ink, and, of course, paper. In Native American hands, Moore’s accounting ledger began a second life as the pictorial battle record of a band of Lakota warriors.
The Guardian reports that we must learn to love uncertainty and failure, according to leading thinkers responding to an annual question posed by Edge.org, which this year was: “What scientific concept would improve everybody’s cognitive toolkit?”
Neil Gershenfeld, director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Centre for Bits and Atoms wants everyone to know that “truth” is just a model. “The most common misunderstanding about science is that scientists seek and find truth. They don’t – they make and test models,” he said.
“Building models is very different from proclaiming truths. It’s a never-ending process of discovery and refinement, not a war to win or destination to reach. Uncertainty is intrinsic to the process of finding out what you don’t know, not a weakness to avoid. Bugs are features – violations of expectations are opportunities to refine them. And decisions are made by evaluating what works better, not by invoking received wisdom.” (link)
The Chronicle Review interviews Sherry Turkle about the possible dangers of social technology from robots to the internet, which she has wrote about in her latest book Alone Together:
Imagine standing in front of a robot, gazing into its wide, plastic eyes, and falling in love. Your heart revs up, and you hope this Other—this humanoid machine—turns your way again, tilts its head in interest, likes you back.It happened one summer to Sherry Turkle, at a lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she is a professor studying the impact of technology on society. She met a metallic robot named Cog—made to resemble a human, with moving arms and a head—which was programmed to turn toward whoever was speaking, suggesting that it understood what was being said. To Turkle’s surprise, she found that she deeply wanted Cog to interact with her rather than with a colleague who was there that day. She realized this human-looking machine was tapping into a deep human desire to see it as alive—as good a companion as any human. She describes it almost like a schoolgirl crush. The experience unnerved her. (link)
The 99 Percent has an interview with Francis Ford Coppola. In response to the question “How does an aspiring artist bridge the gap between distribution and commerce?” he answers:
You have to remember that it’s only a few hundred years, if that much, that artists are working with money. Artists never got money. Artists had a patron, either the leader of the state or the duke of Weimar or somewhere, or the church, the pope. Or they had another job. I have another job. I make films. No one tells me what to do. But I make the money in the wine industry. You work another job and get up at five in the morning and write your script.
This idea of Metallica or some rock n’ roll singer being rich, that’s not necessarily going to happen anymore. Because, as we enter into a new age, maybe art will be free. Maybe the students are right. They should be able to download music and movies. I’m going to be shot for saying this. But who said art has to cost money? And therefore, who says artists have to make money?
In the old days, 200 years ago, if you were a composer, the only way you could make money was to travel with the orchestra and be the conductor, because then you’d be paid as a musician. There was no recording. There were no record royalties. So I would say, “Try to disconnect the idea of cinema with the idea of making a living and money.” Because there are ways around it. (link)
In The Killing Fields of Inequality, via Eurozine, Göran Therborn writes about the three kinds of inequality prevalent in our world - vital, existential and material - their causes and how social status hierarchies are, literally lethal:
In l910-12 an unskilled manual worker in England and Wales had a 61 per cent greater risk of dying between the age of 20 and 44 than a professional man. In l991-93 the extra risk of early adult death had risen to 186 per cent. For a semi-skilled worker the extra mortality risk was 6 per cent before the first world war and 76 per cent in the early l990s.Few people are likely to argue that a society which awards 28 fewer years of life to people in the most disadvantaged neighbourhood (Glasgow Calton) than to those in the most privileged ones (Glasgow Lenzie, London Kensington and Chelsea) is a decent society. Is it a vindication of the superiority of capitalism that male life expectancy in capitalist Russia is now seventeen years shorter than in Cuba. Social status hierarchies are, literally, lethal. Why should those on the lowest rungs of the Whitehall ladder have a four times higher likelihood of dying before retirement age than those on the top rungs? The USA – the richest country on earth, and the most unequal among the rich countries – has the third highest rate of relative poverty of all the 30 OECD countries (after Mexico and Turkey). Such relative poverty means being excluded from many parts of the social and cultural life of your society. But the US also scores badly on absolute poverty rates: the poorest tenth of the US population has an income well below the average poor of the OECD; the income of this group in the US is lower than that of the poorest tenth in Greece. (link)
Finally, some music. I’ve noticed some online reports this week about the neuroscience of why we like music, such as here. Be that as it may, as Geraldine Hunt sings in her disco classic from 1980 “you can’t fake the feeling”:
Some seminal “post-rock”, from their 1991 album, Spiderland:
From a 1991 album collaboration called Passages, the opening track:
Take care out there ;)
Image: via russianavantgard: The Blue Rose, catalogue cover, 1907.
Over at The Bricoleur, Mark Kerstetter discusses The Mysteries of David Lynch:
He decided to forgo psychoanalysis because of the chance it could damage his creativity. He doesn’t draw a consistent or clear distinction between knowing and revealing—the possibility that an artist may know as much as he can, but only reveal what is necessary. He is more verbose about INLAND EMPIRE than his other films. It is also the most abstract. But he gives us a verse from the Upanishads:
We are like the spider. We weave our life and then move along in it. We are like the dreamer who dreams and then lives in the dream. This is true for the entire universe. (link)
Daniel T. Rodgers, in The Chronice Review, writes about changing intellectual paradigms and Economics in an Age of Fracture:
Words and visions for common and interdependent fates had fractured. Across the multiple fronts of intellectual debate, concepts of human nature that had been thick with context, social circumstance, and history gave way to an understanding that emphasized choice, agency, performance, language, and desire. Ability to imagine spheres of collective solidarity—class, neighborhood, or the common good—shrank; notions of structure and power thinned out in favor of self-acting markets and worlds of choice. The drag of history persisted, of course. The pressure of social forces on choice was no less weighty than before. But the concepts that might have helped to hold them clearly in mind had disaggregated. (link)
In Forensic Psychologist there’s an examination of the mental health dangers of solitary confinement:
Since the supermax craze took off in the early 1990s, almost every U.S. state has signed on to the dubious concept, and an estimated 25,000 American prisoners are now locked 24/7 in these tiny, antiseptic cubicles. Although SHU housing was originally intended for relatively short terms of confinement, nowadays prisoners may remain in these constantly lit and electronically surveilled sensory deprivation holes for years - or even decades. (link)
In Market Mysticism, via Eurozine, Roman Frydman and Michael D. Goldberg study the ideology of self-regulating markets and its pseudo-scientific foundations:
whatever their flaws, financial markets and private property are the only social institutions known to us that are able, adequately though imperfectly, to consider diversity of knowledge and intuition in allocating capital. Incentives to innovate and to manage ever-imperfect knowledge are the main underpinnings of capitalism’s success. Conversely, the inability of the planned economies of eastern Europe and the Soviet Union to innovate was one of the main causes of their ultimate collapse – and of the complete disappearance of central planning as a serious economic alternative.
Paradoxically, however, contemporary economic theory has kept alive the core ideas of central planning, because it relies on a similarly false concept of rationality – one whose inadequacy was already proved by Friedrich Hayek. Central planning, Hayek concluded, is by its nature impossible, because no mathematical model can precisely mimic the behaviour of markets.
But mainstream contemporary economics understood Hayek’s conclusion about rationality as if it applied only to planned economies, while basing economic theory on a belief that economists can predict future market changes exactly. The creation and legitimation of today’s most controversial financial instruments rests on this false premise. (link)
The UK’s first scientific trial of psilocybin (magic mushrooms) was reported upon in a BBC programme this week:
“Our aim was to identify the precise areas inside the brain where the drug is active. We thought when we started that psilocybin would activate different parts of the brain. But we haven’t found any activation anywhere. All we have found are reductions in blood flow”
A fall in blood flow suggests that brain activity has reduced. The areas affected were those parts of the brain that tell us who we are, where we are and what we are. When these areas were dampened down, I was no longer locked into my everyday constraints. (link)
Slavoj Zizek writes about Good Manners in the Age of Wikileaks, comparing “cablegate” to the film The Dark Knight and considering the role of secrecy in political history. He quotes this amusing anecdote from the film Baisers volés regarding the difference between tact and politeness:
‘Imagine you inadvertently enter a bathroom where a woman is standing naked under the shower. Politeness requires that you quickly close the door and say, “Pardon, Madame!”, whereas tact would be to quickly close the door and say: “Pardon, Monsieur!”’ (link)
Some music for your listening pleasure:
Dub meets the sounds of Ethiopian soul and jazz:
Funky rhythms in an instrumental remix of an Aril Brikha techno classic:
And finally an epic song rendition from the qawwali legends of Pakistan:
Take care out there ;)
The first week of the New Year (as so defined by the Gregorian calender) has passed us by and it would seem Giuseppe di Lampedusa’s dictum still holds true: “If things are to remain the same, things will have to change.”
At Thinking Out Aloud, Lorenzo writes on Scepticism about our Knowledge of Causation :
David Hume’s sceptical argument about our knowledge of causation is the most important piece of reasoning in modern philosophy. Modern philosophy may be said to have started with Descartes trying to find a certain basis for reasoning – his cogito ergo sum – but his method turned out to be fruitless. It is Hume’s sceptical empiricism from which modern philosophy descends, with differing lines of philosophy deriving from different responses to it. (link)
At Spike Magazine, Hugh Graham writes on Rigour for A Dying World: Houellebecq and Gnosticism:
Once, very long ago, yet not far from our own moral circumstances, a kind of thinking loosely called Gnosticism dealt with the lone individual possessed of a spirit in a world of suffering, evil, and an absent god. Gnostic thought had its roots everywhere in pagan antiquity. It re-emerged in philosophies of individual existence in the 19th century and flourished in our own time as existential thought before being effaced by the triumph of the free market. The latter’s masquerade as a philosophy of life has indeed helped to discourage philosophy itself. But the old philosophy of man and his existence in the world is not dead; it is only asleep. (link)
On NYRB, Charles Simic has a poetic short essay: Winter’s Philosophers:
“Everyone who thinks is unhappy,” says Sergei Dovlatov in one of his stories. Some crows caw all day, some have nothing to say. I see one of them pace back and forth on my lawn the way I’ve seen Hamlet do on stage. Whatever is bothering him seems insoluble, too much for one crow to figure out on his own. Still, no harm trying, I suppose, even with the racket his relatives are making as they fly to and fro, as if the road they oversee is not covered only with fallen leaves and patches of ice, but also with fresh road kill. (link)
At Sentence First, Stan Carey says Omit Needless Criticisms of Redundancy:
Redundancy has a poor reputation in writing and editing. Its modern linguistic sense – which I think derives from information theory – has to do with predictability, but it is more generally associated with needless repetition or wordiness, and is therefore often automatically considered a failing in prose. This, however, is only part of the story. (link)
On NPR there’s a piece on Jay Rosen and American Media’s true Ideology: Avoiding One:
the “view from nowhere” too often limits political reporters to obsessing about winners and losers — who’s up or down — rather than the harder work of determining who’s telling the truth or the effects of the policies those politicians adopt. “Removing all bias from their reports is something that professional journalists actually aren’t very good at,” Rosen says. “They shouldn’t say that they can do this, because it’s very clear to most of the people on the receiving end that they fail at this all the time.” (link)
The Economist reviews Evgeny Morozov’s book The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom :
In fact, authoritarian regimes can use the internet, as well as greater access to other kinds of media, such as television, to their advantage. Allowing East Germans to watch American soap operas on West German television, for example, seems to have acted as a form of pacification that actually reduced people’s interest in politics. Surveys found that East Germans with access to Western television were less likely to express dissatisfaction with the regime. As one East German dissident lamented, “the whole people could leave the country and move to the West as a man at 8pm, via television.” (link)
I watched a fascinating documentary on the Irish channel TG4 this week called The Lightbulb Conspiracy about the planned obsolescence of consumer products and its relationship to our world of economic growth for (it would seem) growth’s sake - but at devastating cost to our environment. No sign of an English-subtitled version on the web yet, though it will be broadcast in a few other European countries over the next couple months:
Planned Obsolescence is the deliberate shortening of product life spans to guarantee consumer demand. As a magazine for advertisers succinctly puts it: “The article that refuses to wear out is a tragedy of business “ - and a tragedy for the modern growth society which relies on an ever-accelerating cycle of production, consumption and throwing away.
TVE - Title COMPRAR TIRAR COMPRA Spain Jan 9, 2011 at 22:00:00 TSR2 - Title PRÊT À JETER Switzerland Feb 6, 2011 at 00:00:00 ARTE Title PRÊT À JETER France Feb 15, 2011 at 00:00:00 ARTE - Title KAUFEN FÜR DIE MÜLL Germany Feb 15, 2011 at 00:00:00 YLE Title PYRAMIDS OF WASTE Finland Mar 13, 2011 at 00:00:00.
Finally some music:
A (very) deep house classic, released on a 12” b-side in 2001:
Motown, mid-seventies, electro-progressive-funk (featuring, though too sparingly, a lovely little keyboard riff that was sampled in a song of recent times, the name of which escapes me now):
And some laidback jazz:
Take care out there ;)
Handel - Largo from “Xerxes”
Take one step out the front door, and an individual brain cell fires. Pass by your rose bush on the way to the car, another specific neuron fires. And so it goes....”