—Nancy Rexroth, “Boys Flying”
Amesvilles, Ohio, 1976, gelatin silver print.
From her book Iowa (1977).
(via B)
What did I like about the [Diana] camera? It was the dream, the liquid dream of the images that I could make with it. I went somewhere with the camera, into my own private landscape, a real mental spot, of needing, of longing, and with a real love of the beautiful…..When I was photographing, it seemed that I was awake and dreaming at the same time. This connection was an actual fact.…
About image softness: Well, I can tell you that I made a whole lot of blurry, out of focus photographs with the Diana! But I was very fastidious in choosing which images to print. In my sub-mind, I was looking for what you might call “The Integrity of the Blur”. I had an unknown set of multiple rules regarding what to blur, and what not to blur ……I aimed to have the degradation/bluring of the image seem as though that was ACTUALLY how things looked, at the time: “My world is looking like this to me, and you are welcome to enter inside…..We are together in this”. The blur had to “work”- on several levels.
—Nancy Rexroth, interview by Blake Andrews, Feb 17, 2011.
Rexroth has been compared to Julia Margaret Cameron, a 19th century photographer who deliberately worked in soft focus as a means toward metaphorical portraiture. Cameron’s approach implicitly shunned the authority of photography as an empirical tool. Similarly, the Diana camera’s plastic lens and toy-like body almost mock the power of precisely calibrated lenses to render mimetic reality, softening the gaze into a kind of crystal ball perspective that is completely unlike that of, say, a Nikon 35mm SLR.
—Deborah Garwood, “My Own Private Iowa”, Dec 12, 2004.